The journey from there to here

One of the most hypocritical things I have heard from the mouths of liberals is that race and gender do not matter.

The fact is, not only does the far left not believe it, but race and sex are oftentimes the ONLY thing that matter to them. And the 2008 Presidential Primary race underscores that pretty heavily.

I can't tell you how many times I have heard someone on the left say they want to vote for Hillary because she would be our first woman President. Or they want to vote for Obama because he would be our first black President.

Come again? If race and sex didn't matter, would we be COUNTING the number of women and/or minorities who hold the office? If they don't matter, can't a white male represent the country every bit as well as they can?

The fact is, to many of these people, race and gender DO matter. And while I would be inclined to be sympathetic to their cause, as a member of the race and gender they choose to villify, I realize it's against my own self interest. Heck, I'd be first against the wall when the revolution comes!

It is not true that America is not ready for a black president. It may be (and I hope it is) simply that they don't wish to vote for a President BECAUSE he is black. Same with a woman President. Why should the presence or absence of melatonin and/or a phallus automatically qualify one for the office any more than it would disqualify them?

The truth is, it shouldn't. And for most conservatives it doesn't. I know several hard core "God and Country" rednecks who would sport Colin Powell bumper stickers if he were to run for President. Or Condoleeza Rice. People they respect, frankly, because they earned respect, not because they pandered for it as a form of reparations from the long dead ghosts of bigots that, sadly, once dominated our country.

I've been called to task repeatedly, for instance, for "bashing" Hillary Clinton. In all of my "bashing", I have not knowingly uttered an untrue word about the woman, nor have I said anything about her that I would not say about a man who embodied the same views she holds. I respond to Hillary Clinton in the same manner as I would any other political candidate with the same platform. She disgusts me, and I sincerely hope that she is not our next President. And I will do my part to try to ensure that it doesn't happen. That's my POV in a nutshell.

When (not if) our country fields a woman Presidential candidate that I feel is capabpe of fulfilling the role, I will not only vote for her, I would actively campaign for her. See, I want the best for my country, and that's not specific to gender.

But to some individuals, gender and race will always override.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 01, 2007
have heard more than one of his supporters support him because he is black, which appalls me


gop's southern strategy is based on the proposition white people are gonna do the white thing in the voting booth. soon as it stops workin so well as it has for nearly 40 years, it's former beneficiaries and practitioners will be fallin all over their dumb asses proclaimin it disgusting and deplorable.
on Dec 01, 2007
are you going to vote for a certain male candidate


lil lost dani is hopin to divert attention away from his feverish letch for kucinich. it's killin jessedacabdriver cuz he's hot on dennis too.
on Dec 02, 2007
nawwww. only racism when and if the other side sees the black guy is gettin the numbers and decides if they wanna win it's time to trot out dat ol mandingo's out to get yo sister thing ('see??? he already got her walkin up to his door wearin nothin but a towel') and find out if it'll do the trick one more time.


Hmm. Must have missed that in Tennessee. Was the trotting done before or after the election, and by the democrats or republicans?

But basically, based upon your allegation, the results of the election, and the facts of the election, the truth never has to enter into it. If the black loses, it is racism. Easy to allege, and you don't have to provide proof. The democrats have that dog and pony show down pat.
on Dec 03, 2007
Must have missed that in Tennessee. Was the trotting done before or after the election, and by the democrats or republicans?


here's poll data thru the first two weeks of october 2006:

Sen: SurveyUSA: Ford 48%, Corker 45% - 09/13/06
Sen: RATING CHANGE: Weak GOP Hold to Weak DEM Gain - 10/02/06
Sen: Rasmussen: Ford 48%, Corker 43% - 10/02/06
Sen: Mason-Dixon: Ford 43%, Corker 42% - 10/02/06
Sen: Middle Tennessee State University: Corker 43%, Ford 42% - 10/04/06
Sen: USA Today/Gallup: Ford 50%, Corker 45% - 10/07/06
Sen: SurveyUSA: Corker 48%, Ford 46% - 10/11/06
Sen: Rasmussen: Ford 48%, Corker 46% - 10/14/06

this ad was paid for by the rnc and ran in very heavy rotation during the third and fourth weeks of october 2006:


WWW Link

(sorry--dunno how to embed youtube stuff here)

on Dec 03, 2007
Easy to allege, and you don't have to provide proof.


see them two fingers pointin right back at you? they're yours huh?
on Dec 03, 2007
I have heard more than one of his supporters support him because he is black, which appalls me.


most of the polls i've seen indicate more blacks currently plan to vote for clinton than for obama.
on Dec 03, 2007
see them two fingers pointin right back at you? they're yours huh?


3 fingers. And that Ad in no way supports your allegations. Accusing him (rightly or wrongly as I do not have a copy of his Disclosure form) of accepting money from Porn producers is somehow racist? The only thing racist in this whole debate is how you and others on the left see racism in every statement. NOTHING about that ad was racist, nor if you did not know he was black, would you garner that information from that ad!

Like the Blog states, it is the DNC and those of their shills that are racist. Corker ran a hard campaign and won - on the merits of the contest, not on race. But then if you want to find racism, I am sure you can dig up an endorsement from some Grand Kleagle for Corker - perhaps to counter the one that Ford got?
2 Pages1 2