The journey from there to here

Another fallen Oklahoma soldier will be buried soon in the Oklahoma Panhandle. And once again, Fred Phelps and his germs will make the trek down to the city of Guymon, Oklahoma to wave their banners of hate at the family of Joshua Pierce, who paid the ultimate price in Iraq.

This time, Phelps and his bacteria are likely to get arrested under a new Oklahoma law that forbids protests at funerals. Many other states are working on enacting such laws.

The problem I have is, while it makes me feel absolutely filthy to say this, Fred Phelps is right when he says such laws are unConstitutional. The First Amendment does not give you the right to free speech, it PROTECTS it, by limiting the restrictions the government may make on your speech. It is made applicable to ALL states by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment.

As much as we may want to shut the door to the Fred Phelps of the world, to lock them out of sight, the simple fact is, we must recognize our duty to the Constitution. If we are to honor this fallen soldier, it is in our best interests to honor the Constitution he died to protect, and not to enact laws that most of us would agree with in principle.

There are simple remedies for Fred Phelps' brand of activism. Have the funeral on private property, and it is acceptable to charge these cretins with trespassing. Bring out local National Guard units, volunteer firefighters, and/or law enforcement officers to form a barricade to protect the family from the "protestors". Keep the funeral details private and accessible only to close family and friends. But to usurp the Constitution because of this speech, no matter how offensive, is to dishonor the Constitution the soldier died for and equally dishonor the flag that will drape the soldier's coffin.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 22, 2006
To compare Phelps' actions with "peace marchers" is not quite apt, kingbee. He's not targetting government entities, he's not targetting religious groups, he's targetting families in their moments of grief. Families should have the right to grieve without having to encounter THIS.


I concur. Peace marchers may be inappropriate at times, and indeed with their spitting on soldiers and labeling them baby killers very repugnant, but they are not singling out soldiers, or bereaving families. I dont like the extreme behaviour at all. But this goes beyond that and into the personal hatred category.
on Mar 23, 2006
To compare Phelps' actions with "peace marchers" is not quite apt, kingbee


i never meant to suggest there was any sort of comparison between phelps and peace protestors...or between phelps and anyone with a shred of humanity, reason or both.

what struck me, i guess, was remembering how easily the unacceptable becomes an appropriate response to the abhorent.
on Mar 23, 2006
Peace marchers may be inappropriate at times, and indeed with their spitting on soldiers


not to wander off too far off into mythland here but i've yet to locate a verifiable first person account of anyone in uniform being spit upon. i've asked a hell of a lotta people who were in the military during the period 1963-1975; not one claim to date. it's possible that'll change two minutes from now, so i'm not ruling it out completely, i have a really difficult time imagining anyone who wasn't totally delusional taking such a foolish risk.
2 Pages1 2