The journey from there to here

The biggest threat to the United States of America is not the Muslim terror cells that are believed to be operating in this and other countries with intentions of attacking us in large scale operations. It isn't right wing militia groups who hoard weapons in rural compounds and train their members to ward off a government attack. It isn't even the swarms of illegal aliens coming across our boarder, aided and abetted by their own governments, to make money to send home to their families in their nation of origin.

No, the biggest threat to the USA is the increasing number of politicians and activists who seek to undermine our Constitutional Rights under the guise of public safety and/or security.

And it bears mentioning that the attack isn't coming from the left or the right, but rather from BOTH sides of the political spectrum. Some third parties have even tried to jump into the fray.

While the left have made a lot of noise about the US Patriot Act, and the potential violations that it presents, they have worked to undermine and even eliminate the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution by interpreting it only to apply to the military, in clear defiance of the concept as expressed in nearly ALL foundation documents. They have even begun to narrowly redefine the First Amendment, insisting that freedom of religion should only be freedom to practice behind closed doors where one's practice does not constitute an offense to another, and insisting that free speech be allowed only as long as the speech does not offend the sensibilities of their special interest groups. They have undermined the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments by allowing Child Protective Services to increase in power by not challenging their policies and procedures manuals even when those policies and procedures directly defy the Constitutional rights of the families affected by CPS intervention.

While the right has protected the second amendment rights of its citizens, they have attempted to violate the First Amendment by creating "Free Speech" zones, by their support of the US Patriot Act and even more drastic measures under the guise of domestic security. They have attempted to do an "end around" on the US Constitution by invoking the War Powers Act, even though we are not in a formally declared war, and the rhetorical "War on Terror" is so open ended that it will absolutely never come to an end. While not completely declaring Martial Law, they have made steps as far in that direction as public opinion will allow them to go without inciting a violent revolution. And there's every reason to believe that, once we've accepted these violations of our liberties, we will allow them to further intrude.

The United States Constitution was NOT written to give rights to individuals within the United States. It was written to DEFINE some of those rights, and to LIMIT the power of the federal government. While the federal government is not supposed to have powers not given in the Constitution, it has assumed those powers and repeatedly denied the states the autonomy intended by the framers of that document.

Because the government of the United States is elected by us as citizens, however, we cannot put the blame on the government, but on ourselves. the government only has as much power as we allow it to have. We have failed to elect legislators who will make a difference, we have failed to petition those legislators for redress of grievances, as is our clearly defined right, and we have failed to hold politicans accountable when they do not listen to us. The solution is as simple as supporting and promoting responsible candidates and, when we can't find them, running for office ourselves. In other words, as was once famously said "we have met the enemy and he is us".

We have a right to DEMAND better government. We have the power and ability to enact sweeping reform without violent revolution. The fact that we fail to do so suggests a complacency that is appalling, given the ubiquity of complaints about the US government, especially as we are in tax season.

The biggest threat to the United States, then, is not an Islamic terrorist. It is not an Earth Firster, or a PETA activist, or even a fat cat politician influenced by bribes. It is Joe Redneck, who values this week's episode of "Grey's Anatomy" more than he does his own freedom.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 17, 2006
I'll agree with you on most of this, even if I tend to disagree with some of your examples.

The thing is though, we are still in a representative republic, and that comes with both benefits and drawbacks. The benefits are well known (if sometimes ignored), so I'll just stick with the few drawbacks.

The fact that We the People are the ones who choose our leaders means that we have the freedom to pick great leaders and scoundrels. At that token, both the great and the scoundrel are free to run. When those of us who bother going to the polls in the first place are making our choices what are which are we putting into office (and what criteria are we using to decide)?

Your "Grey's Anatomy" analogy is perfect, since most who do bother voting use about the same logic when choosing a candidate that they do when choosing what to watch on TV. Flashy images on the screen, impelling characters, poll results and "because there's nothing better on".

We only need to look back to the last presidential election to see the real problem. If a person bothered to go to the websites of each of the candidates, they would have gotten a good handle on what the candidate stood for. Somewhere on the road though, the message changed from actual issues to "the battle of the Leiutenants" among the major parties and two "third party" candidates being arrested for having the nerve to show up to a Presidential Debate.

In other words, those of us who really cared had the resources to read and learn that facts about each candidate. Judging by the things most people talked about though, the only thing that mattered was what was spoon fed to them with flashy images, impelling characters, poll results or "because there wasn't someone better on" (the ballot).
on Feb 17, 2006
Wow, someone who actually sees the US the same way I do. Sure I believe that most, if not all, politicians are corrupt people who only think about how much money they can make and how much money they can spend from others (including tax payers). But they did not get there by applying for the job, they were voted in by those who they claim to represent but instead, like a wolf in sheep's clothing, gain access to the wealth and completely forget why they were elected there in the first place.

I have always blamed the American people (that includes me) for allowing this great country to turn off course towards our own destruction. Just like in a movie, we are inside an out of control car going down hill, with no breaks and the people inside the car would rather fall over a cliff and die rather than try and jump from the car, risking breaking a few bones and some bumps and bruises.

They say that acknowledging the problem is the first step towards solving it but what's the point in acknowledging it if we chose not to continue taking steps to fix the problem.

I don't blame other cultures for being mad and maybe even hating us, but that is not an excuse to use death and destruction as a tool to make a point. And wanting to destroy and entire race or country simply because you don't like they way of life is very wrong as well. So I believe we are in part to blame for the problems in the world but we should not be responsible for their actions.

JMO.
on Feb 17, 2006

#1 by ParaTed2k
Friday, February 17, 2006


I guess the only difference bewteen a 2 lt. Coke and a political party is that you can't by the party at the store and unless you actually do some research you don't really know if your getting what you paid for.
on Feb 17, 2006
I don't even think it is 'security' that is the biggest issue. I think our rights will be leached away a lot sooner by business lobbyists trying to legislate their economic position. Right now the RIAA and software nazis are acting as a law enforcement agency with the total approval of our government. They are demanding searches and "accompanying" law enforcement when they bust businesses that may or may not be using pirated software.

In terms of the real threat of "thought police", corporate America is our biggest foe now. They will sell our electronic privacy to the government in return for having their technologies promoted, or even mandated. Google will sell out the Chinese for a buck, Microsoft will give authorities backdoors into our computers. You think they give those things up for free?

Hell no. The next time there is an anti-trust case, or the next time the government wants to force a new technology on people as they did with digital broadcasting, they'll be paying them back. There needs to be new, draconian standards about lobbyists and 'deals' with business that aren't totally transparent to voters.
on Feb 18, 2006
Many truths but one BIG FALSEHOOD. The Left is not the Democratic Party in this country. The Democratic Party is a party representing
the interests of finance capital :ie Chase , Exxon-Mobil, etc. It is financed primarily by bourgois business interests just as the Republican Party is financed. The Left in this country is represented by the interests of the working class. The revolutionary communist movement is and has always been the LEFT. Your posturings build a FALSE belief among the working class that their class must rely on other bourgois interests to throw them crumbs off the table. Crumbs ill-gotten from the exploitation of wage labor in both the United States and internationally.
The truth is that we are in an international crisis both politically and economically. We have never fully recover4ed from the dot-com
crash of 2000 . The Treasury has been issuing more worthless paper and credit had been eased to prevent a major outcry from the
working class as employment slipped and unease spread. The price of this insufferable debt load is an inflationary environment with
the US economy devalued before rising Chinese and European economies.
The War in Iraq reflects the desperation of the US capitalist class as it tries to hold on to its position of dominant indluence over the
Arabian oil states. Fearful that Bin Laden fundamentalism will mean the fall of the US-influenced Saudi monarchy, they have established bases both in Saudi Arabia and secondly ,Iraq, to have leverage over the richest oil reserves in the world- Iraqi oil.
The growing rebelion in the Arab bourgoisie, reflected by Bin Laden's faction, indicates a shift in power in the world away from the U.S.
This means sharpening rivalries with both China, Russia, and Europe. Lenin described this phenomena in his book Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism. Interimperialist rivalry will set the stage for war and further economic crisis as the debt-ridden West
(US and EU) lose ground to the new Chinese capitalist class. Fascism , the militarisitic rule of capital, is characterized by the elimination of bourgeois civil liberties (Patriot Act) as a means to exercise discipline over the working class and prepare for future international military conflict. This is an essential part of finance capital's way to "solve" its deepening crises.
The way forward for the laboring masses is not through bourgois electoral schemes and "political action" but through building grass roots revolutionary communist organization in the work place and communities. We are tired of the deceivers. It is time to exercise our muscle, not to build profit for the fascists of Chase and Exxon-Mobil, but to build our organization to eventually seize power and start
building an egalitarian society. This can only be accomplished with a dictatorship of the proletariat. Karl Marx describe the the first
workers's revolution, the Paris Commune of 1871. There he describe the ultimate reason why the Commune was crushed by the French and German armies: The communards (Parisian working class) failed to march out to Versailles and destroy the bourgois armed forces that were gathering there.
We learned from the ultimated failure of the Russian Revolution that the proletarian dictatorship must continue as a cultural war
against capitalist ideology of greed and private property; that nationalism can never be the ideolgy of the working class, only internationalism. Do capitalists operate in the confines of their national borders?? Never they organizre production internationally. If
workers of facilties in one country strike, they increase production at other facilities in other countries. In much the same way we must organize amongst all international labor to build one common force for revolutionary change. We must build the party of theinternational
working class in order to have the wisdom and strength to win a long and bloody battle for the emancipation of the working class and the end to wage labor. In this world of immense productivity we need a communist society: Toeach according to his need, from each according to their ability!!
on Feb 19, 2006

Communism does not encourage productivity, it discourages it. Individual liberties must be supressed for a communist nation to succeed as well. While it may sound like a promising idea in theory, the truth is that communism tends to destroy, not build, a free society.

As for the Democrats being the American left, I would disagree. They are not only the left, they are heading even further to the left as moderates jump ship to the GOP or third parties. The Democrats are on "self destruct", and need a major shift in direction.

on Feb 19, 2006
building grass roots revolutionary communist organization in the work place and communities. We are tired of the deceivers. It is time to exercise our muscle

While it may sound like a promising idea in theory, the truth is that communism tends to destroy, not build, a free society.

Absolutely right. Communism works on paper. The inherent greed and laziness of man prevents a truly communist or socialist society.

I liked your article, BTW, Gid. Despite this OT commie.
on Feb 19, 2006
Amen, Brother Gid. I loved the article. Communism does work on paper, as singrdave said, but it will never work in real life, despite what this os2wiz guy says, because humans are too darn selfish. We are greedy; end of story. We need to protect our rights above all else. I believe it was Benjamin Franklin who said (and if it wasn't him, it should have been) . . . I'm paraphrasing here . . . "anyone who is willing to give up liberty for security deserves neither."
That's it.
on Feb 20, 2006
In terms of the real threat of "thought police", corporate America is our biggest foe now.
Good point. The time is long overdue, however, for digital TV.
on Feb 20, 2006
To all:

My... an unreconstructed Communist with the balls to stand up and admit that's what he (or she) is. How refreshing. Unfortunately for him (or her) unreconstructed Communists are destined to go the way of the dinosaur and the eight-track. Capitalism's ability to constantly re-invent, repackage and rebrand itself, as well as its immense capacity to emancipate all of us from certain forms of slavery (even though it does so by way of another form - wage slavery) means that Capitalism will always appeal directly to that greed and selfishness which is characteristic of humanity.

Marx and Lenin alike were both Romantics, in just the degree that they were Revolutionaries. Both believed in an apocalyptic, millenarian Romance of the Perfected Man, typified by the concept of the Workers International that would arise to overthrow Capitalist Imperialism and usher in a new age of the world. While Marx's description of the follies of Capitalism has never been bettered, his diagnosis of its corrupting influence through commodity fetishism and the commodification of everything (including human beings themselves) never been refuted, his program of revolution spreading across the earth and bringing liberty in its wake was strangled at birth by Stalin, its death theorised by Trotsky in his concept of the necessarily permanent revolution.

We love our idols, and our bellies, too much for Marx's vision ever to become a reality. And Capitalism has a proven track record of advancing certain forms of liberty (in particular economic liberty) where Communism has no track record of anything at all - except its co-option in the service of cults of personality (Stalin and Mao Tse Tung). Apparently we have not yet reached the end of history, as Fukuyama (I think) claimed after the collapse of the Soviet Union. We have, however, reached the end of those days in which Communism can be considered as anything more than a charming myth, a Romantic dream of emancipation.

Capitalism is, alas, the only game in town and is going to remain so for the forseeable future. What remains open to doubt and question is the degree to which this Capitalism will be Fascist in nature. Fascism is not a disease of Capitalism per se, it's much more a disease of democracy, but the protean nature of Capitalism does make it open to co-option by Fascism (as is amply demonstrated by the history of the relationship between German capitalists and the Nazi state).

Is American Democracy robust enough to prevent that co-option? Honestly, I don't think so. So ingrained is the American infantile obsession with rights, so profound is the American aversion to the concept of political obligation, that I honestly believe that any politician who promises to feed your ever-expanding bellies and can demonstrate the ability to do so, will be able to trounce your political liberties almost without resistance. I think I'll live to see most Americans sacrificing those liberties to their 'needs' with barely a second thought. After all, what's liberty in comparison to cheap gas and digital TV?

As I've said before, I consider the present generation of Americans to be the degenerate and corrupt children of noble fathers, unworthy of them and, if they were somehow to return from the grave, unrecognisable by them.
on Feb 28, 2006
Keith Windschuttle said the following words on Feb 11 2006.

The moral rationale of cultural relativism is a plea for tolerance and respect of other cultures, no matter how uncomfortable we might be with their beliefs and practices. However, there is one culture conspicuous by its absence from all this. The plea for acceptance and open-mindedness does not extend to Western culture itself, whose history is regarded as little more than a crime against the rest of humanity. The West cannot judge other cultures but must condemn its own. I will finish his lecture.

Now this Keith fellow is a rump-load smarter than I, at the lecture he was giving, he was trying to convey that so long as we let college professors across our nation continue to teach mistrust and shame about our country to our future leaders, this nation is on a collision course, and playing into the destructive Liberal spew of no pride/no solutions shame on America indoctrination until we all become the victims like professors who could not make it in private capitalistic enterprise.

College Professors do not fail random drug tests like Rickey Williams because, it is more important for society to have higher standards for a running back who is in a game 30 minutes 16 Sundays a year, than drug testing a angry Professor parents go in debt sending their kid to be indoctrinated by. The next time an intellectual stands before a class and implies our enemy is the freedom fighter, and George Bush the dictator? I would like to see our President walk into that class and hook jumper cables up to the brilliant mans jewels and say “pardon me Ho-Che-Men, smoke another bowl” , just to prove the educator right for once.

Bottom line is this, if you want higher standards for your 20 year old daughter; save some money and send her to an NFL locker room, not Berkley. A mind is a terrible thing to waste, this is why we test large men who run fast or hit baseballs real far.

on May 27, 2006
super
on Jun 08, 2006
Èíòåðåñóþò ñêðèïòû äëÿ ðàñêðóòêè?
Ñòó÷èòå â àñþ 964982
on Jun 09, 2006
Òàê äåðæàòü!
on Jun 23, 2006
Êîìó íóæåí ñêðèïò SpamIt ñòó÷èòå â àñþ 964982
2 Pages1 2